Mesh Magick Method: Syntax of ideas
We are soaked in a causative environment of events. Some of them may be visible, catch our attention, some are completely hidden from our perception and understanding. Yet, the general law is that all these events are somehow related causatively, meaning that events co-arise and co-depend on one another. This is a subtle yet profound law permeating the whole of universe. Synchronicities are acausal to the observer, yet they are strictly tied with causality at an a-perceptive level. Thus, they are not a-causal, but a-perceptive. The method proposed here is tied with adjusting the perceptive and a-perceptive networks of psychic events and modifying them consciously as to relate and reconstellate the processes that surround us. Whether we apply it in magick, or every day life and psychological and intellectual yoga, it may be of use. It is based on grammar of thought, which is utilizing modules of ideas and patterns of the mind to capture some hidden laws via tools of philosophical maths. You can call this method ‘ideathics’, if you like. Mathematics is a formal discipline and deals with consistent internal objectivity of its language. In contradistinction ideathics if a non-quantifiable conceptual formalisation of thought that like in Chaos Theory creates ‘attractors’, or ‘magnets’ that draws certain thought-patterns from the environment nearer to the attractor-structures.
In, Psychic inertia
In(Exp), Exposure to content in a state of inertia
Sc: Static Conditioned Experiential and Perceptive State
MSc: Momentary conditioned experiential and perceptive state
Receptivity equals inertia multiplied by exposure divided by conditioned state in proportion to momentary state.
Example I: Our receptivity to an advertisement is related to inertia of focus, and if we are continuously exposed to the advert the absorption is governed by our solid conditioned state (or the most ‘continuous, permanent, immaleable’ parts of our mind) in proportion to the momentary solid state (the state our mental continuum in its totality is in at every ‘flash’ of mental events distributed in time).
Example II: Receptivity to a servitor, or a shade of the dead is related to inertia of focus (ignorance/unawareness/indetection/mindlessness), and under exposure we are influenced (absorption) to an extent that our solid conditioned state allows (nature, inlination, character etc.), depending on the strenght of the occurence (exposure) in proportion to our momentary state (under influence/in a given psychological moment).
Af, Active Focus
Sc, Conditioned State
Volition equals Active Focus (mindfulness, simultaneous engagement) in proportion to Receptivity, divided by momentary state multiplied by Awareness.
Example I: Highly focused concentration divided by Receptivity (or the inner psychic millieu and the environment) is divided our regular predispositions at the moment multiplied by awareness of the whole mesh and therefore may be adjusted accordingly by psychological, intellectual, energy and magickal techniques in the desired direction.
Mesh is the sum of all potentialities (pot) divided by occurence of actual events (rev, revealed), think Schrodinger’s cat.
Mesh, Topological space of entropically possible states
Causation is the proportion between Meshes distributed accumulatively through time.
Therefore, combining with the aforementioned patterns:
Receptivity in proportion to the Mesh networks, divided by Causation in proportion to volition proceeds that Volition in proportion to Receptivity is divided by Causality in proportion to Mesh.